Seventh Sense
Use cases

SenseCrypt
Technical library

Individual sign-in on shared workstations

At shared workstations, the terminal displays a sign-in code. The worker completes a live face check on their enrolled phone, so authentication follows the person across stations.

6 sectionsSeventh Sense / SenseCrypt
On this page

01

Shared accounts create inherited access risks

Nobody plans a shared login. It appears because per-user sign-in costs seconds that a floor measured in seconds will not spend, and once one exists it propagates: written down, passed along at handover, kept alive through years of staff turnover.

The cost lands later, and always during an incident. Once a credential is shared, every entry in the record points at a login rather than at a human being, and nothing downstream restores the name.

A credential shared across a shift is public

It ends up written somewhere it can be read, and it goes on working long after every person who was told it has left the organization.

Password changes disrupt every shared user

A rotation has to be announced to the whole shift, which is why the credential is usually never rotated at all, or rotated once and then written down again somewhere new.

Individual logins get quietly bypassed

Authenticating at every handover costs seconds nobody on the floor has, so the session is simply left open for the shift and the shared login walks back in through a side door.

Shared logins leave investigations without names

The question is always who. A shared account can only answer which terminal, and that is the answer nobody needs.

02

The station is a display, not a credential store

For phone sign-in, the workstation is never issued a SenseCrypt credential. It has no enrollment, holds no key, and performs no face check. It draws a sign-in page carrying a code and keeps a connection open until something tells it whose session to start.

Trust is anchored instead in hardware with exactly one owner, the worker's own enrolled phone. Scanning, the liveness test, the one-to-one comparison and the signature all take place there. Only once that sequence completes is the terminal released into a session, and the session carries a name.

Scan, look, in

The code is scanned with the companion app and the face check finishes on the worker's own handset. The station receives no password or one-time code, and nobody has to say anything aloud on a floor where sound carries.

Use a supported browser at each station

There is no agent to install, no key to provision and no enrollment to perform on the hardware. Any terminal that can render a page can start a ceremony.

A stolen terminal holds no enrollment or sign-in key

In the phone methods, the terminal stores no enrollment material or enrolled-phone authentication key. Browser sessions and application data remain subject to your workstation policy, including ending sessions between users.

Permissions travel with the worker

Roles resolve centrally and ride in the token your application reads, so somebody who moves between three terminals in an hour has the same access at each of them and no local configuration to maintain.

03

Where a webcam station fits

Some floors do not permit personal phones, and some sites cannot issue a device to every worker. There is an enterprise webcam method for exactly that situation, and its scope should be stated plainly rather than discovered during a pilot: it is a deviceless mode available to enterprise customers, not as a self-serve option, and it must run on secure terminals: part of the assurance comes from the managed workstation and the network it sits on, and an unsecured terminal exposes webcam capture to injection attacks such as virtual-camera or video-stream injection. This licensed on-premises method processes captures inside the customer deployment and does not add an enrolled-phone possession factor.

Capture in that method happens at the workstation camera rather than on a phone the worker carries, which is a materially different posture from the mobile ceremony and is priced, scoped and deployed accordingly. If that is the shape of your floor, contact sales@seventhsense.ai and the conversation starts with the network and the workstation build.

The two phone methods keep the check on the phone

With Simple QR and with passkeys, liveness and the one-to-one match run inside the companion app on the worker's own enrolled phone, and the station learns only that the ceremony passed.

The webcam method uses enterprise-side capture

The account still belongs to one worker and the record still names that worker. What changes is where the capture happens, which is why the method is scoped to enterprise deployments on secure terminals.

04

What the identity records show

The point of all this is that the log finally names people. It is worth being exact about what that log is, because audit language gets stretched in this market and a security reviewer will notice.

Two records exist here, and they are not the same kind of record. Every authentication appends to a person-level stream that is read only and exports as CSV: the worker, the moment, and the device that answered. The hash-chained, tamper-evident log is the console one, and it covers configuration changes made by administrators. There is no customer-side verification of that chain, so the honest answer to an auditor is that we run it, not that you can check it yourself.

Every session carries a name

Whoever completed the ceremony owns the session that follows it. An investigation needs that mapping and nothing less, and it is precisely what a shared account is structurally unable to supply.

Two logs, two jobs

One answers who was standing at the terminal. The other answers who changed the settings behind it. Naming them separately is worth doing in a questionnaire, because they carry different guarantees.

Your application logs its own decisions

Because permissions are enforced inside your application, the record of what a worker then did with them belongs to your application rather than to the identity provider.

05

Deployment requirements for the workforce

One assumption carries the whole design, and it is the first thing to test rather than the last: during the shift, every worker has to hold a device capable of running the companion app, or the site has to qualify for the enterprise webcam method on secure terminals.

Where that holds, the handover ends up quicker than typing a password ever was, and accountability stops being the thing traded away to buy the speed. Where it does not, the device question has to be settled first, because no amount of configuration substitutes for a trust anchor that is not there.

06

Frequently asked questions

What does the shared workstation actually hold?

For phone sign-in, no enrollment material or enrolled-phone authentication key. It renders a sign-in page with a code and waits for the worker's own phone to complete the ceremony. Browser sessions and application data on it remain subject to your workstation policy.

Does each worker get their own audit record?

Yes. Every sign-in resolves to one enrolled worker and appends to a person-level record that exports as CSV. It captures authentication events. What that worker then does inside your application is recorded by your application, because that is where the permissions are enforced.

How fast is a handover?

Scan, glance, done. No password or one-time code is typed at the station, which was both the part that cost the time and the reason the shared password appeared in the first place.

Can we run this without personal phones?

Yes, with Simple Webcam, a deviceless method for enterprise customers in which capture happens at the workstation camera rather than on a phone. It must run on secure terminals, because unsecured terminals expose webcam capture to injection attacks. This licensed on-premises method processes captures inside the customer deployment and does not add an enrolled-phone possession factor. It is not self-serve: contact sales@seventhsense.ai to discuss whether your environment qualifies.

Does a shared station sign-in count as phishing-resistant?

The terminal holds no password; the sign-in flow asks only for an email address. Where a requirement is written with the words phishing-resistant, enable the passkey path, which carries FIDO2/WebAuthn origin binding.

Does the station have to be a managed device?

For the QR flow, no. The ceremony happens on the worker's phone and the station is a display. For the enterprise webcam method the workstation and the network are part of the assurance, which is why that method is scoped to enterprise deployments and must run on secure terminals: an unsecured terminal exposes webcam capture to injection attacks.

Next step

The next level of detail depends on your stack, so the fastest route is a conversation.